<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  ini_set(): A session is active. You cannot change the session module's ini settings at this time in <b>/home/assailry/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php</b> on line <b>69</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/assailry/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php:69) in <b>/home/assailry/public_html/plugins/generic/citationStyleLanguage/CitationStyleLanguagePlugin.inc.php</b> on line <b>478</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/assailry/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php:69) in <b>/home/assailry/public_html/plugins/generic/citationStyleLanguage/CitationStyleLanguagePlugin.inc.php</b> on line <b>479</b><br />
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ashfaq Fazal , 
AU  - Dr. Khizar Hayat  , 
PY  - 2026/03/05
Y2  - 2026/09/11
TI  - The Historical Development of Democratic Institutions in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (1947–1997): Constitutional Evolution, Political Transformation, and Institutional Challenges
JF  - `
JA  - ASSAJ
VL  - 5
IS  - 01
SE  - Articles
DO  - 
UR  - https://www.assajournal.com/index.php/36/article/view/1932
SP  - 3794-3810
AB  - &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article examines the historical development of democratic institutions in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) from 1947 to 1997, focusing on constitutional evolution, political transformation, and institutional challenges. Since its establishment in October 1947, AJK has occupied a unique constitutional and political position in South Asia, shaped by the unresolved Kashmir dispute, revolutionary politics, and Pakistan’s administrative influence. ¹ Unlike conventional democratic systems, AJK emerged during armed conflict, resulting in an institutional vacuum and provisional governance structures. ²&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The study divides democratic development into four major phases: Revolutionary Institutional Formation (1947–1949), Controlled Institutionalization (1949–1970), Democratic Breakthrough (1970–1974), and Parliamentary Institutionalization (1974–1997). These phases illustrate the transformation of AJK from a revolutionary administration into a parliamentary political system. ³ Particular emphasis is placed on the leadership of Sardar Ibrahim Khan, the constitutional implications of the Karachi Agreement, and the significance of the Interim Constitution Act 1974.⁴&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Using qualitative historical methods, this article relies on constitutional texts, archival records, political memoirs, and scholarly literature. It argues that while democratic institutions expanded through electoral reforms, judicial development, and parliamentary governance, their autonomy remained limited by federal intervention and administrative dependency. ⁵ the article concludes that AJK represents a unique model of incomplete democratization in a disputed territory. ⁶&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Keywords&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;: &lt;/em&gt;Democratic Institutions, &lt;em&gt;Democratic Development, Administrative Dependency, Interim Constitution, Autonomy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
ER  -